| 04 August 2010
YouTube URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QehKw5usTks
This is in support of our Market view analysis of July 30 & Aug 02 respectively. Where the GBPUSD has attempted to touch our inital target of 1.5988 as stated. However, indeed GBPUSD still registered a high of 1.5966 slightly below our price call. As of this writing and recording, the GBPUSD is at the 1.5877 corrective move as momentum slowed down on a day to day basis. As most traders and market participants on spot & futures have settled positions comparing with a daily decline on open interest and volume.
This goes the same with the EURUSD pacing with the GBPUSD while awaiting for the NFP numbers on Friday. The correction is also due to the technical adjustments were most prices were at their oversold and overbought areas. Prompting the USDX index to recover above the 81.00bp which the most influenced pair of the USDCHF made a high at 1.0531 at current price. Do expect more wider swings on both directions as liquidations may be within a rapid market where some re-quites may still happen along the way. A voicebox directly from the Reuters dealing system would definitely help. Please allow us to ask... how many of the retail broker/dealers offer a direct link or access from their source? Ever wondered why? :) Could it be a white label ! Pls. view our Forex Training Information Summary. You can send your comments to This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
For a complete review of our analysis, pls. visit our website at http://www.megatrade101.com for more information. Our Blog at http://megatrade101.blogspot.com for the opening and mid-week analysis report will always be available during the week.
Top Articles
- Cost of Trading ?
- How does a Price Page Indicator help an investors’ trading? How is it summarized?
- What are the best indicators to use?
- What is your batting average in trading this market or any market at all?
- Why do we have to trade FX while we can trade other forms of investment with fewer risks involved?




